Anonymous asked: I am a little and I disagree with the fact that it is pedophilia. " daddy" is simply a pet name. the little is not really a child ad is simply givin control to the caring figure (the daddy) to nurture and take care of her. it is less about being a child and more about reverting to a time when life was simple if you really want to fight for women being able to express themselves sexually and be free to do as they please, why are you shitting on littles when it doesn't affect you and theyare happy
i cannot argue with you guys any more i have heard these arguments so many times
1. ” daddy” is simply a pet name.
incorrect. why does it have to be daddy? you know that daddy is linked to father/daughter relationships and its time for you to stop pretending that its not.
daddy kink is so messed up if it isn’t about incest and pedophilia, if it really is just about power play then it wouldn’t make a difference if you just used master or some other dominating title, if you refuse to use anything other than “daddy” because it doesn’t “feel the same” then yes it is in fact the incest and pedophilia you’re fetishizing and it’s disgusting how is this still even being discussed (source)
2. the little is not really a child ad is simply givin control to the caring figure (the daddy) to nurture and take care of her. it is less about being a child and more about reverting to a time when life was simple
also incorrect. you have to be fucking kidding me. i am aware that it is not an actual child but the girl has to act like a child in order to get off. that is glorifying pedophilia. and what about the “daddy”? he gets off on seeing the girl look and act like a child!!! he is a pedophile!!! i dont care if its not a real child!!!!!!!! he is getting off on the childlike appearance and behavior of a girl!!! bad!!! wrong!!!!! pedophilia!!!!
reverting to a time when life was simple??? are you kidding me??? thats bullshit. stop pretending.
3. if you really want to fight for women being able to express themselves sexually and be free to do as they please, why are you shitting on littles when it doesn’t affect you and they are happy
As a former kinkster, I can concur with every statement a radfem posts on here about how BDSM is detrimental to women’s safety and rights in every way.
I probably would’ve spewed the same, “Stop being judgmental of consenting people!” bullshit two years ago if you told me the same critiques. It’s shortsighted and they’re either getting angry because 1. They don’t understand how shit like that connects or 2. They feel guilty.
It’s all about their “sexual liberation” and doing what they want, with no regards to the situations others have had to endure with rape or abuse. It’s selfish and astronomically trivial. (source)
- REAL ‘little girls’ get sexually assaulted and raped by their ‘daddy’s’ everyday - and you people have the hide to re-enact that.
- REAL ‘little girls’ do not get believed when this happens, and consequently have to live with the awful memory for the rest of their life - and you people have the hide to re-enact that.
- REAL ‘little girls’ are incapable of consenting, and THEIR BODIES are ACTUALLY irreparably policed by the thoughts of being terrorised, although you people RE-ENACT THAT.
- YOU are valuing and prioritising your orgasms over the REAL victims, and the REAL abuse that happens EVERY DAY - and that is the REAL oppressing matter, THAT MATTERS.
- I could not give a fuck what you do with your body, but the moment you (and many other people like you) glorify the terrible atrocity that is pedophilia, it is beyond just ‘you’ and ‘your body’ and ‘your daddy’ - it is then a moral problem that should not be normalized, because sexualising the innocence of children being destroyed by their own fathers is NOT something you get to promote.
- I am sick and fucking tired of you people using the father/daughter relationship to gain orgasms. I’m sick of you people then saying ‘when we say ‘little’ and ‘daddy’ we aren’t actually talking about father/daughter’. WELL YES YOU ARE. You have exploited a disastrous situation and made it sexy. That is exactly what you have done! You cannot honestly say that when people in this fucked up phenomenon wear diapers, draw in colouring books, get called ‘little girls’, wear conventional gendered clothing made specifically for female children - and have a ‘daddy’ (I really don’t feel like I have to explain it’s another word for ‘father) who takes on conventional fatherly roles - AND THEN THEY HAVE SEX WITH EACH OTHER - and then say ‘it’s not the same as pedophilia’ WELL YES IT IS.
- It would be like if you both wore blackface and then had ‘black’ sex. Or if one of you decided to pretend to be disabled and you had ‘disabled’ sex. That would be exactly what you’re trying to do - replicate another form of something. EXCEPT, this is not racism or ableism - it’s glorifying pedophilia; and that’s SICK.
- You do not live in a fantasy world free of morality - what you do in your sex life reflects you as a person; in the exact same way a pedophile isn’t just a pedophile when they’re raping a child - they’re a pedophile always. A murderer isn’t just a murderer when they’re killing people, a racist isn’t just a racist when they’re yelling racial slurs, and a misogynist isn’t just a misogynist when they’re bashing/hating women. They are ALWAYS those things. (source)
Anonymous asked: Carnation
Carnation: If I handed you a concert ticket right now, who would you want to be the performer?
I’m not sure when this ask is from, I haven’t been on too frequently in the past day or so, so I apologize if this took forever to get answered!
stg if i see one more 90 pound girl on my dash crying about how “skinny shaming hurts!” and “buying clothes is just as hard when you’re thin!” i’m gonna lose! my! mind!
you are already the size that plenty of women would commit literal murder to be, you are already the size that basically ensures…